事例
Connecting Claims to Identify Fraud Networks
これでできることInvestigators gain a connected view of relationships and supporting evidence that may otherwise be difficult to identify across individual claims.
Insurance fraud can be difficult to detect because individual claims may appear legitimate when reviewed separately. Suspicious behavior may only become visible when relationships between different claims, people, businesses, addresses, or service providers are analyzed together.
Questions investigators could ask
Investigators could ask:
- “Which people or businesses repeatedly appear across suspicious claims?”
- “Which claims share the same repair shop, doctor, lawyer, or address?”
- “Show the relationships between these claims.”
- “Are there unusual clusters inside the claims network?”
Support existing fraud-detection systems with connected evidence
Consilience would not necessarily replace existing fraud-detection systems. Instead, it could provide investigators with a connected view of relationships and supporting evidence that may otherwise be difficult to identify.